Guild icon
wafer.space Community
ℹ️ - Information / general / FWIW - We delivered the GDS for Run #2
Between 2026-06-30 11:59 p.m. and 2026-08-01 12:00 a.m.
6:23 a.m.
Quick! 🤞 it'll come DRC clean
6:31 a.m.
Is there a list / view of the final project list that made it ?
👍🏼 1
Avatar
судонет 2026-07-17 6:40 a.m.
i'm also keen to know what projects made it into the shuttle
👍🏼 1
Avatar
Ghaith Al Sabagh 2026-07-17 6:50 a.m.
yeah something like that one for run 1 https://github.com/wafer-space/ws-run1 would be awesome
wafer.space GF180MCU Run 1. Contribute to wafer-space/ws-run1 development by creating an account on GitHub.
Avatar
Tim 'mithro' Ansell 2026-07-17 7:35 a.m.
I'm sure @Leo Moser (mole99) will generated a https://github.com/wafer-space/ws-run2 once we have everything confirmed with GF.
👍 1
Avatar
Leo Moser (mole99) 2026-07-17 7:45 a.m.
Absolutely. First, we need to confirm that our reticle is manufacturable. Afterwards, I'll create the repository for ws-run2.
Avatar
What kind of time frame does GF usually take ? ( like ... a day, a week, a month )
7:49 a.m.
Also does the final layout use 2 half rows/cols ?
Avatar
Leo Moser (mole99) 2026-07-17 7:57 a.m.
We are actively communicating right now, but it depends on the issue.
👍 1
7:58 a.m.
For the ws-run2 shuttle, we added these additional cuts.
Avatar
Huh, but in that diagram it looks like you're cutting in the middle of full size projects ?
Avatar
судонет 2026-07-17 8:03 a.m.
it sure does
Avatar
So 9 quarter slots, 18 1x0p5 and 9 0p5x1?
8:13 a.m.
Plus 18 full size
Avatar
Avatar
RebelMike
So 9 quarter slots, 18 1x0p5 and 9 0p5x1?
судонет 2026-07-17 8:13 a.m.
looks like it
8:13 a.m.
if that cut is intentional
Avatar
Avatar
tnt
Huh, but in that diagram it looks like you're cutting in the middle of full size projects ?
Why is that surprising? It wouldn't make much sense to add a cut on top of an existing cut. (edited)
Avatar
Avatar
Leon
Why is that surprising? It wouldn't make much sense to add a cut on top of an existing cut. (edited)
судонет 2026-07-17 8:14 a.m.
fair point (edited)
Avatar
@Leon I would have expected the image underneath to use the right size of projects for the tiling. So actually show 9 quarter slots, 18 1x0p5, 9 0p5x1 and 18 full sizes.
8:15 a.m.
Rather than show full size dies sliced in half.
Avatar
Ah, I assumed the image was from run 1, and they hadn't generated a corresponding image for run 2 yet
Avatar
Leo Moser (mole99) 2026-07-17 8:16 a.m.
That number is correct. The image is only for illustration and doesn't yet show run 2 :)
👍 2
Avatar
Avatar
Leo Moser (mole99)
That number is correct. The image is only for illustration and doesn't yet show run 2 :)
судонет 2026-07-17 8:16 a.m.
:)
Avatar
Avatar
tnt
@Leon I would have expected the image underneath to use the right size of projects for the tiling. So actually show 9 quarter slots, 18 1x0p5, 9 0p5x1 and 18 full sizes.
судонет 2026-07-17 8:22 a.m.
damn that's a lot of half-heights
Avatar
Did GF accept the reticle ? Are there still issues being worked on ?
Avatar
Leo Moser (mole99) 2026-07-27 5:54 a.m.
There were some minor DRCs which we were able to waive. The mask is currently being generated.
🥳 5
Avatar
@Leo Moser (mole99) Was any of those in TT ? If there are things in the common infra, I'd fix them for the next runs if possible to avoid having to waive them.
Avatar
Leo Moser (mole99) 2026-07-28 6:49 a.m.
@tnt As far as I could see, they weren't in the TT infrastructure. Our insight into the DRC violations is limited. We get a DRC report from GF with a list of categories that were violated and one or two screenshots of examples in the layout. But no actual markers with coordinates. However, it's sufficient to determine which of the DRC rules still need some work in the open source DRC deck.
Exported 30 message(s)
Timezone: UTC+0